Which of the following indicates the lowest fall risk in terms of mobility?

Choosing "No Limitations" as the indicator of the lowest fall risk in terms of mobility is justified because this option signifies that the individual has full strength and capability to move without any impairment. Individuals without limitations can maintain balance, execute movements smoothly, and have the ability to react appropriately to potential hazards in their environment.

In contrast, the other options suggest varying degrees of mobility impairment or assistance needs. Dizziness or generalized weakness can lead to instability and increase the likelihood of falls. Similarly, using an assistive device or the need for assistance from two people indicates significant mobility challenges, further elevating the risk. Lastly, being immobilized or requiring assistance from one person reflects substantial limitations that inherently heighten the chance of falls. Thus, "No Limitations" clearly aligns with the description of the lowest fall risk.